Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace implementation of WorkItem and Workflow Session #2733

Closed
froggin opened this issue Oct 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Replace implementation of WorkItem and Workflow Session #2733

froggin opened this issue Oct 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@froggin
Copy link
Contributor

froggin commented Oct 22, 2021

Required Information

  • [ 6.5.8 ] AEM Version, including Service Packs, Cumulative Fix Packs, etc: _______
  • [ 5.0.14 ] ACS AEM Commons Version: _____
  • [ yes ] Reproducible on Latest? yes/no

Expected Behavior

When building through CM, this codebase should successfully build.

Actual Behavior

When building through CM, CQBP:84 is being triggered for any classes implementing WorkItem or WorkflowSession.

Steps to Reproduce

Try building this codebase through CloudManager, and you'll get a CSV containing issues with CQBP:84 being cited.

Links

https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/using/how-to-use/custom-code-quality-rules.html?lang=en#oakpal-rules
froggin pushed a commit to froggin/acs-aem-commons that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2021
Adobe-Consulting-Services#2733 - Removing implementation of WorkItem …
4abd57e 
…and WorkflowSession to agree with CQBP-84 rules.
froggin pushed a commit to froggin/acs-aem-commons that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2021
resolves Adobe-Consulting-Services#2733 - Removing implementation of …
2da57c1 
…WorkItem and WorkflowSession to agree with CQBP-84 rules.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@froggin