JS embedding #83
Merged
JS embedding #83
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the grammar loader should be able to load the embedded grammar scope at least at a minimum level
in fact it is sufficient to show only the names of the tests, no more details are needed for the moment
maximtop
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR embeds the JS grammar into the adblock grammar, in a similar analogy to how JS or CSS is embedded in HTML. The picture below shows the result:
Since JS is an "external grammar", so it should be installed separately, but both VSCode and GitHub Linguist will recognize it. See github-linguist/linguist#6020 (comment)