Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Makes the css selector for the checkbox style more accurate #8

Merged

Conversation

sersanchus
Copy link

@sersanchus sersanchus commented Jun 12, 2024

It solves the ugly styling of list views that have a checkbox in the first column:

image

@sersanchus
Copy link
Author

sersanchus commented Jun 12, 2024

Hi @peluko00 and @miquelalzanillas, here it comes another minor fix for base_geoengine.

@peluko00 peluko00 merged commit cb84653 into APSL:17.0-mig-base_geoengine Jun 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@peluko00
Copy link
Member

Hi @peluko00 and @miquelalzanillas, here it comes another minor fix for base_geoengine.

Many thanks @sersanchus, i'll fix another bug when see the infobox on one point on the map.
Do you want to divide the to do pending work for this module?

@sersanchus
Copy link
Author

Hi @peluko00 and @miquelalzanillas, here it comes another minor fix for base_geoengine.

Many thanks @sersanchus, i'll fix another bug when see the infobox on one point on the map. Do you want to divide the to do pending work for this module?

That would be nice. Apart from that the domain widget is still missing, what else have you pointed to be in the todo list? Maybe issues could be created for every todo task and we will be assigning them. ¿What do you think?

@peluko00
Copy link
Member

Hi @peluko00 and @miquelalzanillas, here it comes another minor fix for base_geoengine.

Many thanks @sersanchus, i'll fix another bug when see the infobox on one point on the map. Do you want to divide the to do pending work for this module?

That would be nice. Apart from that the domain widget is still missing, what else have you pointed to be in the todo list? Maybe issues could be created for every todo task and we will be assigning them. ¿What do you think?

I only see the bugs in the to do list according to base_geoengine documentation.
Yes! Nice idea to create an issue for every task

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants