-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gradient tests for benchmark collection #967
Labels
Comments
See also #944 |
Implemented for PEtab test cases in |
https://github.com/wesselb/fdm might be relevant here |
Done in #1548 |
dweindl
added a commit
to dweindl/AMICI
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2024
…ck output * Make the result more informative and more readable. * Re-enable some test problems, use stricter tolerances for some at least AMICI-dev#967 * More problem-specific settings
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A lot can go wrong with wrong parameter scales, thus there should be gradient tests for (some of) the benchmark models. Suggest FDs, maybe at (deterministically sampled) random parameters (as the gradients at the optimum tend to be rather sensitive).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: