-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ASE calculator refactor and jit dipole models #95
Conversation
We should add the variance and mean to the properties for writing issues. |
Done in the above commit, I think it is ready to merge (if you verify that there is not performance difference to the previous calculator. ) |
Better to compute the mean and variance of the forces on the GPU and then transfer that one time to cpu. |
Note that there are things like HAL that need the full list of forces and/or energies to compute the bias.
|
That's a good point. Maybe add a flag to enable it. |
After discussing with Cas we agreed that it is sufficient to return the mean and variance of energies and forces, it shouldn't be necessary to return the output force for all models in a committee for HAL. |
The maximum difference could also be useful.
… On 9 May 2023, at 15:16, davkovacs ***@***.***> wrote:
After discussing with Cas we agreed that it is sufficient to return the mean and variance of energies and forces, it shouldn't be necessary to return the output force for all models in a committee for HAL.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
-- Gábor
Gábor Csányi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Pembroke College Cambridge
Pembroke College supports CARA. A Lifeline to Academics at Risk. http://www.cara.ngo/
|
Are you sure? This is my bias force expression from
|
Thanks @bernstei I clarified again with Cas and have changed to return all committee forces. |
No description provided.