fix(engine): limt clause conjunction with where clause or group by clause

[aceforeverd]

fixes:

• limit of where clause
• limit of group by (+ having) clause
• correctness of limit 0: should returns empty list

close #2433

the pr introduce a new iterator (LimitIterator) used for limit clause conjunction with where clause. The iterator is not seekable, so window project over this is not supported as well, we need the compile time check for this.

some restrictions should noted:

• limit clause do not support in request mode, I will add compile check later
• by practice, limit clause should used together with order by, while we do not support order by yet. As a result, limit result may not deterministic

[github-actions]

SDK Test Report

  81 files    81 suites   7m 51s ⏱️
168 tests 166 ✔️ 2 💤 0 ❌
210 runs  208 ✔️ 2 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit a011b2e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Linux Test Report

       55 files       203 suites   1h 4m 0s ⏱️
  9 903 tests   9 896 ✔️ 7 💤 0 ❌
14 579 runs  14 572 ✔️ 7 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit a011b2e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

HybridSE Linux Test Report

19 792 tests   19 790 ✔️  7m 11s ⏱️
     239 suites           2 💤
       67 files             0 ❌

Results for commit a011b2e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

HybridSE Mac Test Report

19 792 tests   19 790 ✔️  7m 34s ⏱️
     239 suites           2 💤
       67 files             0 ❌

Results for commit a011b2e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.90% // Head: 75.79% // Decreases project coverage by -0.11% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (a011b2e) compared to base (6175266).
Patch coverage: 72.95% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2447      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     75.90%   75.79%   -0.12%     
  Complexity      368      368              
============================================
  Files           629      638       +9     
  Lines        119694   119939     +245     
  Branches       1044     1056      +12     
============================================
+ Hits          90859    90907      +48     
- Misses        28619    28816     +197     
  Partials        216      216              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
hybridse/src/passes/physical/limit_optimized.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
hybridse/src/vm/catalog_wrapper.h	47.60% <51.72%> (+2.34%)	⬆️
hybridse/src/passes/physical/limit_optimized.cc	75.00% <75.00%> (ø)
hybridse/src/vm/physical_op.cc	79.82% <84.21%> (+0.29%)	⬆️
hybridse/src/vm/runner.cc	68.14% <95.23%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
hybridse/include/vm/physical_op.h	91.85% <100.00%> (ø)
...src/passes/physical/batch_request_optimize_test.cc	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
hybridse/src/testing/engine_test_base.cc	80.64% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
hybridse/src/vm/runner.h	92.86% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
...radigm/openmldb/batch/nodes/DataProviderPlan.scala	62.50% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 30 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tobegit3hub]

LGTM

[aceforeverd]

the pr also correct behavior of limit 0, @tobegit3hub pls recheck it :)

[zhanghaohit]

LGTM

[tobegit3hub]

LGTM