Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CMakeLists.txt to ignore cmake_osx_architecture in TESTS #362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

gangatp
Copy link
Collaborator

@gangatp gangatp commented Apr 30, 2024

Previously libreSSL could not be built on arm64 machines, so there was a flag to build the test only for intel x86_64 machines.

After updating the libreSSL library, it might not be the case anymore. So removing the CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURE flag.

Previously libreSSL could not be built on arm64 machines, so there was a flag to build the test only for intel x86_64 machines. 

After updating the libreSSL library, it might not be the case anymore. So removing the CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURE flag.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.10%. Comparing base (b203943) to head (e0f5e72).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #362      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    69.19%   71.10%   +1.90%     
===========================================
  Files          271      271              
  Lines        28691    30307    +1616     
===========================================
+ Hits         19854    21551    +1697     
+ Misses        8837     8756      -81     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gangatp gangatp requested a review from vijaiaeroastro May 8, 2024 15:33
@vijaiaeroastro vijaiaeroastro merged commit 6c92731 into develop May 13, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants