Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Simple application dialogue, non streaming, unable to respond to data #2184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Simple application dialogue, non streaming, unable to respond to data

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ def execute_block(self, message_list: List[BaseMessage],
request_token = 0
response_token = 0
write_context(self, manage, request_token, response_token, chat_result.content)
reasoning.get_reasoning_content(chat_result)
reasoning_result = reasoning.get_reasoning_content(chat_result)
content = reasoning_result.get('content')
if 'reasoning_content' in chat_result.response_metadata:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet appears to be part of a function within an AI framework that deals with executing blocks in a conversation. However, it lacks context about the data types, expected outputs, and dependencies used by manage, write_context, reasoning.get_reasoning_content, and chat_result. Based on this information, here are some potential issues and suggestions:

  1. Variable Initialization:

    • Ensure that request_token and response_token are properly initialized before use. They should be either default values or derived from other variables.
  2. Reasoning Content Handling:

    • The method get_reasoning_content is called twice on the same object (chat_result). This might lead to unexpected behavior if only one call is necessary. It's important to understand why both calls are needed.
    • Consider storing the result of the first call so that you don't repeat work when the second call is made.
  3. Content Retrieval:

    • Check if there's a possibility that content returns None. If not handled appropriately, it could cause errors later in the process.
  4. Response Metadata Check:

    • Validate that 'reasoning_content' exists in chat_result.response_metadata. This ensures that the logic that relies on this metadata does not fail due to missing keys.
  5. Error Handling:

    • Implement error handling around critical operations like calling methods and accessing dictionary attributes to prevent crashes if inputs are invalid.
  6. Performance Optimization:

    • Review how execute_block interacts with other functions and ensure that no unnecessary computations are performed multiple times.

To provide more specific guidance, additional details about these functions and their interdependencies would be helpful. Otherwise, these points cover general areas where improvements could potentially be made to improve readability, robustness, and efficiency of the code.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit ce79e39 into main Feb 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_simple_chat branch February 9, 2025 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant