-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Simple application dialogue, non streaming, unable to respond to data #2184
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ def execute_block(self, message_list: List[BaseMessage], | |||
request_token = 0 | |||
response_token = 0 | |||
write_context(self, manage, request_token, response_token, chat_result.content) | |||
reasoning.get_reasoning_content(chat_result) | |||
reasoning_result = reasoning.get_reasoning_content(chat_result) | |||
content = reasoning_result.get('content') | |||
if 'reasoning_content' in chat_result.response_metadata: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code snippet appears to be part of a function within an AI framework that deals with executing blocks in a conversation. However, it lacks context about the data types, expected outputs, and dependencies used by manage
, write_context
, reasoning.get_reasoning_content
, and chat_result
. Based on this information, here are some potential issues and suggestions:
-
Variable Initialization:
- Ensure that
request_token
andresponse_token
are properly initialized before use. They should be either default values or derived from other variables.
- Ensure that
-
Reasoning Content Handling:
- The method
get_reasoning_content
is called twice on the same object (chat_result
). This might lead to unexpected behavior if only one call is necessary. It's important to understand why both calls are needed. - Consider storing the result of the first call so that you don't repeat work when the second call is made.
- The method
-
Content Retrieval:
- Check if there's a possibility that
content
returnsNone
. If not handled appropriately, it could cause errors later in the process.
- Check if there's a possibility that
-
Response Metadata Check:
- Validate that
'reasoning_content'
exists inchat_result.response_metadata
. This ensures that the logic that relies on this metadata does not fail due to missing keys.
- Validate that
-
Error Handling:
- Implement error handling around critical operations like calling methods and accessing dictionary attributes to prevent crashes if inputs are invalid.
-
Performance Optimization:
- Review how
execute_block
interacts with other functions and ensure that no unnecessary computations are performed multiple times.
- Review how
To provide more specific guidance, additional details about these functions and their interdependencies would be helpful. Otherwise, these points cover general areas where improvements could potentially be made to improve readability, robustness, and efficiency of the code.
fix: Simple application dialogue, non streaming, unable to respond to data