Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: The project cannot be started #2040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

fix: The project cannot be started #2040

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The project cannot be started

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit defe853 into main Jan 20, 2025
4 checks passed
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration):
migrations.AddField(
model_name='applicationaccesstoken',
name='language',
field=models.CharField(default=smartdoc.conf.Config.get_language_code, max_length=10, verbose_name='语言'),
field=models.CharField(default=application.models.api_key_model.get_language, max_length=10, verbose_name='语言'),
),
]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code does not contain significant irregularities, but there are a few areas that could be optimized or improved:

  1. Imports: The import of smartdoc.conf is not used anywhere else in the migration file and should either be removed if it's no longer needed, or use it where necessary if functionality has changed.

  2. Function Call Optimization: Calling Config.get_language_code() directly inside the CharField can lead to performance issues if this function is computationally expensive. If get_language_code() might vary between different instances or configurations, consider caching its result unless you have a specific reason not to.

Overall, the migration appears correct for adding a new field with default behavior depending on application.models.api_key_model.get_language, so you might want to focus more on refining any unused imports and possibly exploring ways to improve efficiency if there were any functional concerns about calling functions within fields.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_project branch January 20, 2025 07:03
@@ -46,7 +50,7 @@ class ApplicationAccessToken(AppModelMixin):
, default=list)
show_source = models.BooleanField(default=False, verbose_name="是否显示知识来源")

language = models.CharField(max_length=10, verbose_name="语言", default=CONFIG.get_language_code)
language = models.CharField(max_length=10, verbose_name="语言", default=get_language)

class Meta:
db_table = "application_access_token"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no major issues with the provided code, but one suggestion could be to remove the duplicate call to CONFIG.get_language_code() as it is already called once earlier in the file. Additionally, you may want to ensure that the string 'language' matches an actual translation key in your system's translations (if such keys exist).

@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ class Migration(migrations.Migration):
migrations.AddField(
model_name='user',
name='language',
field=models.CharField(default=smartdoc.conf.Config.get_language_code, max_length=10, verbose_name='语言'),
field=models.CharField(default=users.models.user.get_language, max_length=10, verbose_name='语言'),
),
]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code has one potential issue:

Issue: The default value for the language field is currently set to use a function from a non-existent module smartdoc.conf. This will raise an error at runtime if there's no such configuration.

Optimization Suggestion: It would be better to replace this with a default language code that makes sense for your application or retrieve it dynamically if necessary, depending on user preferences or other business logic. Here’s how you can adjust the code:

from django.db import migrations, models


class Migration(migrations.Migration):
    initial = True

    dependencies = [
        # Add your dependencies here
    ]

    operations = [
        migrations.CreateModel(
            name='User',
            fields=[
                ('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False)),
                (
                    'username',
                    models.CharField(max_length=100, unique=True),
                ),
                (
                    'email',
                    models.EmailField(unique=True),
                ),
                (
                    'age',
                    models.IntegerField(),
                ),
                (
                    'language',
                    models.CharField(default='en', max_length=5),  # Default to English
                ),
            ],
            options={
                'verbose_name': 'User profile',
                'verbose_name_plural': 'User profiles',
            },
        ),
    ]

This assumes that 'en' (English) is the most appropriate default language for your application. If this needs to be dynamic, further considerations should be taken into account based on the application requirements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant