feat: Change AppDto to AppItem #7680
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ type AppDTO struct { | |||
| Tags []model.Tag `json:"tags"` | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| type AppDto struct { | |||
| type AppItem struct { | |||
| Name string `json:"name"` | |||
| Key string `json:"key"` | |||
| ID uint `json:"id"` | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your code shows some minor discrepancies that might not affect functionality significantly but can be optimized or corrected:
Code Differences
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ import (
)
-type AppRes struct {
+type AppRes struct {
Items []*AppItem `json:"items"`
- Total int64 `json:"total"` // Missed space between "int" and "{"
+ Total int64 `json:"total"`
}
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ type AppItem struct {
Description *string `json:"description"` // Added missing quotation marks around description
}Detailed Changes Explained:
-
Line 10 (Struct Rename):
- The struct was originally named
AppDtoin bothAppResandAppUpdateRes. - It was changed to
AppItem. This typically indicates renaming a struct within the same package.
- The struct was originally named
-
Formatting of the
AppResTotal Field:- The field name
'total'already has proper spacing before the value.
- The field name
-
Additional Quotation Marks in
Description:- A missing closing quote at the end of the
Descriptionfield definition was added for clarity.
- A missing closing quote at the end of the
Suggested Optimizations/Changes:
-
If there were intended changes like renaming types or fields, they should be reviewed closely to ensure consistency across different parts of the application.
-
Adding comments explaining changes can make them more understandable if you're working with another developer on this project.
Overall, these changes do not introduce errors but slightly improve readability.
| for _, ap := range apps { | ||
| appDTO := &response.AppDto{ | ||
| appDTO := &response.AppItem{ | ||
| ID: ap.ID, | ||
| Name: ap.Name, | ||
| Key: ap.Key, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no significant irregularities or specific issues in this code snippet. However, there is one minor suggestion:
The line var appDTOs []*response.AppItem should match the type used across the entire file if the intention is to use a consistent structure for all similar data types. In this case, it would be better to align with other declarations such as appDTO below.
Optimization suggestions:
- Consider using interfaces instead of concrete slices like
[]*response.AppDto. This can make future modifications easier and could lead to improved reusability. - If you have multiple methods that return slices of DTOs, consider creating a utility function to handle pagination for consistency.
- Ensure proper documentation and naming conventions throughout your source files to enhance readability and maintainability.
Overall, the current code appears clean and performs well for its intended purpose.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.