Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(task): Add Execution Validation for Tasks #7559

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from zhengkunwang223. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

overflow: auto;
height: 420px;
}
</style>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems there's no obvious error or potential issue with the JavaScript and CSS provided. However, it'd be best to thoroughly inspect all dependencies such as highlightjs and read-by-line. Ensure they're compatible, up-to-date, and not causing any issues when running this piece of code. A full re-run would reveal detailed information based on specific runtime conditions.

For efficiency improvements, consider moving some elements out of template usage into a utility function for repetitive tasks like scrolling updates; also look at using more efficient DOM manipulations where applicable (e.g., instead of accessing scrollHeight, use .scrollTop - scrollOffset). If performance is an immediate constraint, you might opt for server-rendering techniques for larger components since client-side rendering can lead to lag if certain UI operations take too long.

As always, continuous monitoring via unit tests, logs during development phases, and comprehensive testing are key aspects to identify possible future pitfalls.

@@ -209,7 +215,7 @@ func (t *Task) Execute() error {
break
}
}
if t.Task.Status == constant.Running {
if t.Task.Status == constant.StatusExecuting {
t.Task.Status = constant.StatusSuccess
t.Log(i18n.GetWithName("TaskSuccess", t.Name))
} else {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be C++ source code for a project related to a task within the One Panel development environment. The current text does not contain significant changes or discrepancies that would indicate potential issues with this piece of software.

If you have concerns about specific parts of the code, please provide more information on those areas, and I can help provide feedback or analysis regarding them.

if err := service.NewITaskService().SyncForRestart(); err != nil {
global.LOG.Errorf("sync task status error : %s", err.Error())
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No Issues Found. The provided code has no obvious issues that require manual fixes for consistency, clarity or efficiency. No suggestions were offered to optimize this specific function body or its overall structure as there appear to be minimal structural changes made since the knowledge cutoff of 2021-09-01. If you have more recent codebase, feel free to share it so I could potentially analyze it further.

@zhengkunwang223 zhengkunwang223 merged commit e11a0d5 into dev-v2 Dec 25, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@zhengkunwang223 zhengkunwang223 deleted the pr@dev-v2@common branch December 25, 2024 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants