Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Support fix node #7549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

feat: Support fix node #7549

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

ssongliu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@@ -306,6 +309,7 @@ func (u *SettingService) UpdateSSL(c *gin.Context, req dto.SSLUpdate) error {
} else {
addrItem = strings.ReplaceAll(addrItem, "http://", "https://")
}
_ = settingRepo.Update("MasterAddr", addrItem)
if err := xpack.UpdateMasterAddr(addrItem); err != nil {
global.LOG.Errorf("update master addr from db failed, err: %v", err)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There do not appear to be any specific irregularities, issues, optimizations, etc. noted in this code snippet that warrants detailed elaboration or comment. The function appears to contain several methods and checks within a larger context designed to modify settings for different services based on received inputs.

Some general comments:

  • masterAddr is imported but it does not seem directly used here or integrated into the method calls. It might not play a significant role if its use is restricted to other parts of the codebase.

Given there are no immediate observations suggesting issues with the syntax, style, efficiency, concurrency considerations, security vulnerabilities (like incorrect data input handling), memory management, I would say, overall, these changes do not warrant major revisions. If the functionality or flow could be improved at this stage considering current knowledge, then further discussion should happen between developers about how to best implement enhancements like error-handling improvements or more efficient algorithms, without altering base operationally necessary pieces.

If you provide an example where certain lines are problematic or inefficient, we can discuss the actual problems related to those areas and suggest solutions. Otherwise, as far as code quality concerns go, these few lines don't stand out.

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ const message = {
helpDoc: 'Help Document',
bind: 'Bind',
unbind: 'Unbind',
fix: 'Fix',
},
search: {
timeStart: 'Time start',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, but based on the given snippet of TypeScript code in your question I can not provide you with precise information about the mentioned programming changes. The context is too abstract to identify specific differences between two different versions or even which version(s) you're talking about; however, one may assume there were no significant discrepancies due to being within the same timeframe (2021-09-01 till now). However, to ensure the accuracy and validity of such conclusions, you should have detailed analysis from multiple software developers rather than relying on mere observations like these.

Also remember that while checking for inconsistencies or errors, one might look into whether certain variables still hold their original values without being reassigned across the updated versions.

Lastly, consider this comment: "Optimization suggestions" would be better described elsewhere since it pertains more to performance improvements, tuning code, enhancing efficiency, or other aspects unrelated specifically to the difference detection issue at hand.

@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ const message = {
helpDoc: '幫助文档',
bind: '綁定',
unbind: '解除綁定',
fix: '修復',
},
search: {
timeStart: '開始時間',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The given code snippet is already well-formatted and does not contain any inconsistencies, potential issues, or optimizations that could be suggested for improvement. It appears to follow good practices such as variable naming conventions (CamelCase), consistent use of semicolons, and indentation for readability. There is no specific issue or suggestion that can be derived from this comparison without additional input on the nature of the questions being asked.

Copy link

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit 542512f into dev-v2 Dec 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev-v2@feat_node_fix branch December 24, 2024 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants