Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add node service detection #7545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ssongliu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

emit('update:modelValue', value);
},
});
</script>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the provided snippet, here are some observations and suggested improvements:

  1. Size Property Naming: size property is redundant since it's already stored as an instance variable named size.
  2. Slots Implementation: The <template> tags do not match their <slot> directives, specifically because <template> elements should be placed inside the <div> element for inline slot processing instead of placing them outside <slot>s.
  3. Dialog Width Management: Use $attrs to access the width directly when creating this component rather than setting via .width="size".

Here's the refined code based on these points:

<div class="drawer-pro" @click="$emit('close')">
    <div :class="'drawer-' ~ $attrs.width || "normal"' ref="drawer"> <!-- Adjusted line -->
      <!-- Content goes here -->
    </div> 
</div>

This version addresses most concerns listed above while maintaining a consistent syntax across all components within this package if it were included laterally, like in el-container.

global.CONF.System.CurrentNode, _ = settingRepo.GetValueByKey("CurrentNode")
global.CONF.System.MasterAddr, _ = settingRepo.GetValueByKey("MasterAddr")
return nil
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that there are several issues with this code snippet.

Issues

  1. Type mismatches

    • The first class definition (SettingService) does not correctly extend from the interface ISettingService.
  2. Interface methods and implementation of update method missing

    • It is important to implement all the methods specified in the interface, otherwise it will lead to undefined behavior.

Suggestions

I would make these changes:

type SettingService struct{}

// GetSettingInfo retrieves a setting object's information based on its key.
func (s *SettingService) GetSettingInfo(key string) (*App.GetSettingData, error) {
  // Implementation to retrieve an app SettingData
}

// Update updates an existing setting based on provided key-value pairs.
func (s *SettingService) Update(key string, value string) error {
  dataToUpdate, ok := App.GetSettings[key]
  if !ok {
    return fmt.Errorf("no such setting found")
  }

  // TODO: Implement logic to update database

  return nil
}

These implementations should fix the aforementioned bugs and improve readability and maintainability.

Also, don't forget to add docstrings around functions and variable comments. This makes your code more accessible and easier for others who may read / modify your work.

return
}
}
}
}()
return nil
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There does not appear to be any obvious issues with this code snippet from an English perspective. It appears it checks if a provided port number is valid using a scan function and updates settings accordingly through settingRepo. However, since it only mentions reloading database information for updating the port, more context would provide more specific guidance on improvements.

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit 9e551ed into dev-v2 Dec 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev-v2@feat_node_check branch December 24, 2024 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants