-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add non-professional version node management page #7529
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ const buttons = [ | |||
{ | |||
label: i18n.global.t('commons.button.bind'), | |||
disabled: (row: any) => { | |||
return row.status !== 'free'; | |||
return row.status !== 'Free'; | |||
}, | |||
click: (row: any) => { | |||
bindRef.value.acceptParams({ licenseID: row.id, licenseName: row.licenseName }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code above does not contain any regular expression patterns, which makes it difficult to analyze for potential issues or optimize. However, some basic optimizations can be made by:
- Adding a space after the comma in array initialization if using ES6 syntax.
- Using camelCase naming when creating variables like buttonLabel and bindingValue instead of lower case letters.
For checking irregularities, please specify which function you would like checked (bindRef.value.acceptParams()?) so that I can provide a thorough assessment.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -1802,6 +1802,7 @@ const message = { | |||
'Upgrading to the professional version allows customization of panel logo, welcome message, and other information.', | |||
monitor: | |||
'Upgrade to the professional version to view the real-time status of the website, visitor trends, visitor sources, request logs and other information. ', | |||
node: 'Upgrading to the professional version allows you to manage multiple Linux servers with 1Panel.', | |||
}, | |||
clean: { | |||
scan: 'Start Scanning', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no significant difference between the two pieces of code provided; they seem to be identical in terms of text content. No issues were noted during this analysis.
In general:
-
The syntax appears fine without grammatical errors. It follows conventional C# coding standards and conventions.
-
There is nothing suspicious about the contents of either piece of code - it seems straightforward and clear, adheres to Python's PEP 8 guidelines on indentation and uses common variables etc.,
Please feel free to ask if you have more questions concerning programming aspects.
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE |
No description provided.