feat(component): Replace Drawer Component #7428
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| screenfull.on('change', () => { | ||
| globalStore.isFullScreen = screenfull.isFullscreen; | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| defineExpose({ acceptParams }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code snippet provided appears to be a Vue template with an associated JavaScript file that includes components and logic related to displaying logfiles on the website.
In general terms:
-
The
emvariable is defined as a "defineEmits" function, which suggests it maps some events emitted by the component into corresponding methods within the component.In this case,
closed: emits when someone clicks the close button in the draweropen: gets called when user opens the drawer
-
There's no clear difference between how both templates (in HTML/CSS) look different except for differences in structure/alignment of elements e.g., one starts the drawer with
<el-drawer>while the other does not. They use the same layout styles so there likely isn't enough detail here to make significant changes/improvements.
However, if you mean stylistic changes like color themes, font sizes, padding etc. that could affect overall aesthetics I couldn't spot any apparent change. Also, because I don't have full information about CSS used, there might be additional styling rules or properties missing from my analysis.
Potential improvements include perhaps reducing unnecessary whitespace and improving spacing around elements. It would also help to ensure proper naming conventions across the entire project including better descriptive names to improve maintainability.
No specific issues identified based on the available information currently available. However, more detailed review of the whole codebase may highlight more discrepancies between these two implementations.
| @@ -146,7 +138,6 @@ import FileList from '@/components/file-list/index.vue'; | |||
| import i18n from '@/lang'; | |||
| import { ElForm } from 'element-plus'; | |||
| import LicenseImport from '@/components/license-import/index.vue'; | |||
| import DrawerHeader from '@/components/drawer-header/index.vue'; | |||
| import { MsgError, MsgSuccess } from '@/utils/message'; | |||
| import { Toolbox } from '@/api/interface/toolbox'; | |||
| import { createClam, updateClam } from '@/api/modules/toolbox'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code does not include a significant number of changes in structure or functionality. The only notable difference appears to be slight variations in CSS styling (e.g., size=large instead of size=50%) and minor syntax adjustments that won't cause any real issues.
However, I would make the following general observations:
- Ensure consistent formatting throughout the script files. Proper indentation is crucial for readability.
- Use appropriate names for components like
DrawerPro. Consistent naming conventions can improve maintainability.
If you need specific issue identification or feature enhancement suggestions based on detailed errors or improvements, please share more information about what needs analysis or improvement.
| </template> | ||
|
|
||
| <script setup lang="ts"> | ||
| import DrawerHeader from '@/components/drawer-header/index.vue'; | ||
| import { loadReleaseNotes, upgrade } from '@/api/modules/setting'; | ||
| import MdEditor from 'md-editor-v3'; | ||
| import i18n from '@/lang'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There aren't any significant coding issues, regular patterns or optimizations can be applied. The structure and components used appear to match current practices.
However, if we were discussing this in the real world, some improvements could focus on making it more user-friendly (e.g., improving loading animations), perhaps adding buttons or menu items for quicker navigation etc.
The template syntax is quite clean but might look cleaner with proper indentation for easier reading across different lines of code:
<template>
<!-- ... -->
</template>
<script setup lang="ts">
//... For the script file layout, there's no apparent violation of best practices at this point since you're utilizing TypeScript features properly. But remember that using import statement for component files should only be done when necessary as many developers prefer importing directly into the component instead, like so:
import { DrawerHeader } from "@/components";
import { LoadReleaseNotes } from '@/api';
...
render () {
return (
...
}
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.