Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust response code for SMS reply #2325

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2018
Merged

Conversation

mryenq
Copy link
Contributor

@mryenq mryenq commented Jul 16, 2018

Why: 4xx-class errors caused by random
incoming messages would clutter log output.

How: Adjust the response code.

Hi! Before submitting your PR for review, and/or before merging it, please
go through the following checklist:

  • For DB changes, check for missing indexes, check to see if the changes
    affect other apps (such as the dashboard), make sure the DB columns in the
    various environments are properly populated, coordinate with devops, plan
    migrations in separate steps.

  • For route changes, make sure GET requests don't change state or result in
    destructive behavior. GET requests should only result in information being
    read, not written.

  • For encryption changes, make sure it is compatible with data that was
    encrypted with the old code.

  • For secrets changes, make sure to update the S3 secrets bucket with the
    new configs in all environments.

  • Do not disable Rubocop or Reek offenses unless you are absolutely sure
    they are false positives. If you're not sure how to fix the offense, please
    ask a teammate.

  • When reading data, write tests for nil values, empty strings,
    and invalid formats.

  • When calling redirect_to in a controller, use _url, not _path.

  • When adding user data to the session, use the user_session helper
    instead of the session helper so the data does not persist beyond the user's
    session.

  • When adding a new controller that requires the user to be fully
    authenticated, make sure to add before_action :confirm_two_factor_authenticated.

**Why**: 4xx-class errors caused by random
incoming messages would clutter log output.

**How**: Adjust the response code.
head :forbidden
# Invalid requests don't require a response for now, and 4xx
# errors from random incoming messages junk up the logs
head :ok
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we may want to render a 403 here under a lot of circumstances, if for example the signature on the request is incorrect or our app thinks the request is malformed. Otherwise those errors won't be reported to us.

**Why**: 4xx-class errors caused by random incoming
messages would clutter log output.

**How**: Adjust the response code, vary based on error
type.
@@ -44,7 +36,11 @@ def process_failure(result)
result.to_h
)

head :forbidden
if [email protected]_valid?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe instead of signature_valid?, we could do something like this:

if @message.unsupported_message_type?
  head :ok
else
  head :forbidden
end

...since what we really want is render a 200 when the message type is unsupported, and error in all other cases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the general approach, but that method feels a little contrived to serve this particular case. I'm trying to think of a good way to address the concern but with a better method. (I think the concept of 'valid' seems clearer and more standardized.)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the important things is that we not swallow an error here. Currently, this would swallow an error for missing fields in the request.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was misreading how this works in the message class. This looks like it works.

@mryenq mryenq merged commit 5b5f9d3 into master Jul 20, 2018
@mryenq mryenq deleted the mryenq-adjust-invalid-sms-response branch July 23, 2018 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants