Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
capabilities: add capability cgroup controller
On 07/08/16 09:13, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2016-07-07 20:27:13, Topi Miettinen wrote: >> On 07/07/16 09:16, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> On Sun 2016-07-03 15:08:07, Topi Miettinen wrote: >>>> The attached patch would make any uses of capabilities generate audit >>>> messages. It works for simple tests as you can see from the commit >>>> message, but unfortunately the call to audit_cgroup_list() deadlocks the >>>> system when booting a full blown OS. There's no deadlock when the call >>>> is removed. >>>> >>>> I guess that in some cases, cgroup_mutex and/or css_set_lock could be >>>> already held earlier before entering audit_cgroup_list(). Holding the >>>> locks is however required by task_cgroup_from_root(). Is there any way >>>> to avoid this? For example, only print some kind of cgroup ID numbers >>>> (are there unique and stable IDs, available without locks?) for those >>>> cgroups where the task is registered in the audit message? >>> >>> I am not sure if anyone know what really happens here. I suggest to >>> enable lockdep. It might detect possible deadlock even before it >>> really happens, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt >>> >>> It can be enabled by >>> >>> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y >>> >>> It depends on >>> >>> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y >>> >>> and maybe some more options, see lib/Kconfig.debug >> >> Thanks a lot! I caught this stack dump: >> >> starting version 230 >> [ 3.416647] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 3.417310] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 95 at >> /home/topi/d/linux.git/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2871 >> lockdep_trace_alloc+0xb4/0xc0 >> [ 3.417605] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) >> [ 3.417923] Modules linked in: >> [ 3.418288] CPU: 0 PID: 95 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#97 >> [ 3.418444] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), >> BIOS Debian-1.8.2-1 04/01/2014 >> [ 3.418726] 0000000000000086 000000007970f3b0 ffff88000016fb00 >> ffffffff813c9c45 >> [ 3.418993] ffff88000016fb50 0000000000000000 ffff88000016fb40 >> ffffffff81091e9b >> [ 3.419176] 00000b3705e2c798 0000000000000046 0000000000000410 >> 00000000ffffffff >> [ 3.419374] Call Trace: >> [ 3.419511] [<ffffffff813c9c45>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 >> [ 3.419644] [<ffffffff81091e9b>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0 >> [ 3.419745] [<ffffffff81091f1f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 >> [ 3.419868] [<ffffffff810e9a84>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xb4/0xc0 >> [ 3.419988] [<ffffffff8120dc42>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x42/0x600 >> [ 3.420156] [<ffffffff8110432d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff8163183b>] __alloc_skb+0x5b/0x1d0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81144f6b>] audit_log_start+0x29b/0x480 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff810a2925>] ? __lock_task_sighand+0x95/0x270 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81145cc9>] audit_log_cap_use+0x39/0xf0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff8109cd75>] ns_capable+0x45/0x70 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff8109cdb7>] capable+0x17/0x20 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff812a2f50>] oom_score_adj_write+0x150/0x2f0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81230997>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x160 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff810e33b7>] ? update_fast_ctr+0x17/0x30 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff810e3449>] ? percpu_down_read+0x49/0x90 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81233d47>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81233d47>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb7/0xf0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81231048>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1b0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff812533c6>] ? __fget_light+0x66/0x90 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81232078>] SyS_write+0x58/0xc0 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81001f2c>] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x300 >> [ 3.420170] [<ffffffff81849c9a>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 >> [ 3.420170] ---[ end trace fb586899fb556a5e ]--- >> [ 3.447922] random: systemd-udevd urandom read with 3 bits of entropy >> available >> [ 4.014078] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc >> Begin: Loading essential drivers ... done. >> >> This is with qemu and the boot continues normally. With real computer, >> there's no such output and system just seems to freeze. >> >> Could it be possible that the deadlock happens because there's some IO >> towards /sys/fs/cgroup, which causes a capability check and that in turn >> causes locking problems when we try to print cgroup list? > > The above warning is printed by the code from > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2871 > > static void __lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags) > { > [...] > /* We're only interested __GFP_FS allocations for now */ > if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) > return; > > /* > * Oi! Can't be having __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs disabled. > */ > if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags))) > return; > > > The backtrace shows that your new audit_log_cap_use() is called > from vfs_write(). You might try to use audit_log_start() with > GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL. > > Note that this is rather intuitive advice. I still need to learn a lot > about memory management and kernel in general to be more sure about > a correct solution. > > Best Regards, > Petr > With the attached patch, the system boots without deadlock. Locking problems still remain: [ 3.652221] ====================================================== [ 3.652221] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 3.652221] 4.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#101 Not tainted [ 3.652221] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 3.652221] systemd/1 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3.652221] (tasklist_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff81137ddd>] cgroup_mount+0x7ed/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] but task is already holding lock: [ 3.652221] (css_set_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81137c59>] cgroup_mount+0x669/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3.652221] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3.652221] -> #3 (css_set_lock){......}: [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e92b3>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x1c0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184e137>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x37/0x50 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff811374be>] cgroup_setup_root+0x19e/0x2d0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff821911fc>] cgroup_init+0xec/0x41d [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff82171f68>] start_kernel+0x40c/0x465 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff82171294>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2f/0x31 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8217140e>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x178/0x18b [ 3.652221] -> #2 (cgroup_mutex){+.+...}: [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e92b3>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x1c0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184af5f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x350 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8113962a>] audit_cgroup_list+0x4a/0x2f0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81145d19>] audit_log_cap_use+0xd9/0xf0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8109cd75>] ns_capable+0x45/0x70 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8109cdb7>] capable+0x17/0x20 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff812a2f00>] oom_score_adj_write+0x150/0x2f0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81230947>] __vfs_write+0x37/0x160 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81230ff8>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1b0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81232028>] SyS_write+0x58/0xc0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81001f2c>] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x300 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184ea1a>] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a [ 3.652221] -> #1 (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){+.+...}: [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e92b3>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x1c0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184dfc1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x31/0x40 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810901d9>] copy_process.part.34+0x10f9/0x1b40 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81090e23>] _do_fork+0xf3/0x6b0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81091409>] kernel_thread+0x29/0x30 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810b71d7>] kthreadd+0x187/0x1e0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184eb7f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 [ 3.652221] -> #0 (tasklist_lock){.+.+..}: [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e8dfb>] __lock_acquire+0x13cb/0x1440 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e92b3>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x1c0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184e3f4>] _raw_read_lock+0x34/0x50 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81137ddd>] cgroup_mount+0x7ed/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81234d98>] mount_fs+0x38/0x170 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8125626b>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6b/0x150 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81258f8c>] do_mount+0x24c/0xe30 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81259ea5>] SyS_mount+0x95/0xe0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184e965>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [ 3.652221] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3.652221] Chain exists of: tasklist_lock --> cgroup_mutex --> css_set_lock [ 3.652221] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3.652221] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3.652221] ---- ---- [ 3.652221] lock(css_set_lock); [ 3.652221] lock(cgroup_mutex); [ 3.652221] lock(css_set_lock); [ 3.652221] lock(tasklist_lock); [ 3.652221] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3.652221] 1 lock held by systemd/1: [ 3.652221] #0: (css_set_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff81137c59>] cgroup_mount+0x669/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] stack backtrace: [ 3.652221] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ torvalds#101 [ 3.652221] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Debian-1.8.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 3.652221] 0000000000000086 0000000024b7c1ed ffff880006d13bb0 ffffffff813c9bf5 [ 3.652221] ffffffff829dbd20 ffffffff829cf2a0 ffff880006d13bf0 ffffffff810e60a3 [ 3.652221] ffff880006d13c30 ffff880006d067b0 ffff880006d06040 0000000000000001 [ 3.652221] Call Trace: [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff813c9bf5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e60a3>] print_circular_bug+0x1e3/0x250 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e8dfb>] __lock_acquire+0x13cb/0x1440 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81210bcd>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2bd/0x630 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e92b3>] lock_acquire+0xe3/0x1c0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81137ddd>] ? cgroup_mount+0x7ed/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184e3f4>] _raw_read_lock+0x34/0x50 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81137ddd>] ? cgroup_mount+0x7ed/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81137ddd>] cgroup_mount+0x7ed/0xbc0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff810e5637>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x57/0x1f0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81234d98>] mount_fs+0x38/0x170 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8125626b>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6b/0x150 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81258f8c>] do_mount+0x24c/0xe30 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff812105bb>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x28b/0x5e0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff811cc176>] ? strndup_user+0x46/0x80 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff81259ea5>] SyS_mount+0x95/0xe0 [ 3.652221] [<ffffffff8184e965>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 Rate limiting would not be a bad idea, there were 329 audit log entries about capability use. -Topi From b857ec7d436f6fbb8c33e8d6a16d2f16175517d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Topi Miettinen <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:45:30 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: check options and capabilities before locking to avoid a deadlock Signed-off-by: Topi Miettinen <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information