Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation for the standard library #965

Closed
antoyo opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Documentation for the standard library #965

antoyo opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
docs enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase.
Milestone

Comments

@antoyo
Copy link

antoyo commented Apr 29, 2018

Hi.
Is there any documentation for the standard library?
Thanks.

@andrewrk
Copy link
Member

andrewrk commented Apr 29, 2018

Hi antoyo

Here's the roadmap to get documentation for the standard library:

@andrewrk andrewrk added this to the 0.4.0 milestone Apr 29, 2018
@andrewrk andrewrk added the enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. label Apr 29, 2018
@tiehuis tiehuis added the docs label Jul 23, 2018
@andrewrk andrewrk modified the milestones: 0.4.0, 0.5.0 Feb 18, 2019
@markfirmware
Copy link
Contributor

Without doc comments, will the doc processor still produce a structured presentation of struct’s, functions, etc? I think that would be helpful in the short term.

@andrewrk
Copy link
Member

Without doc comments, will the doc processor still produce a structured presentation of struct’s, functions, etc?

Yes absolutely and it will additionally show the inferred error sets, so you can see all the ways it is possible for a function to fail. There's a lot of helpful information a documentation generator can show even with no doc comments.

@andrewrk
Copy link
Member

This is now done. See #21 (comment) for the remaining issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants