-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Illumos 6451 - ztest fails due to checksum errors
6451 ztest fails due to checksum errors Reviewed by: George Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <[email protected]> Reviewed by: Jorgen Lundman <[email protected]> Approved by: Dan McDonald <[email protected]> References: https://www.illumos.org/issues/6451 illumos/illumos-gate@f9eb9fd Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
ba5ad9a
commit 91d8884
Showing
1 changed file
with
26 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
91d8884
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this applicable to ZoL (not just illuminos) and a possible candidate for 0.6.5-release? I've been troubleshooting some ztest issues which still occasionally fail on Linux kernels 4.4.11 and 4.4.12 even with commit 151f84e applied, however a few cherry picked patches (including this one) seems to have eliminated the issues, but I'm still trying to narrow down which commit(s).
91d8884
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Trucido yes this applies to ZoL. However, it's probably not a candidate for the 0.6.5-release branch, we try and limit the patches to critical issues which could impact users. ztest isn't something anyone but a developer would run.
91d8884
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@behlendorf Understood, perhaps I'm not using ztest as intended - however I did see quite a few issues related to it. I'll try zfsstress or other conventional methods. Apologies for any inconvenience I may have caused.