Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable v8cache on Windows only #404

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2019
Merged

Disable v8cache on Windows only #404

merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2019

Conversation

guybedford
Copy link
Contributor

This is an alternative workaround for #395 given that disabling the v8 cache in #403 turned out to be such a large performance regression.

Since the bug report came from Azure on Node.js 10, this just disables using the v8cache in Windows only as part of the cache runtime itself.

@guybedford guybedford requested a review from styfle as a code owner May 22, 2019 12:23
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 22, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #404 into master will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #404      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.29%   73.48%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          14       13       -1     
  Lines         397      396       -1     
==========================================
  Hits          291      291              
+ Misses        106      105       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 83.12% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f0b0911...133a78f. Read the comment docs.

@guybedford guybedford merged commit 67ebbf1 into master May 24, 2019
@guybedford guybedford deleted the disable-v8cache-windows branch May 24, 2019 01:23
@guybedford guybedford mentioned this pull request May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants