Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DocDB][SQLsmith] util/uuid: ERROR: Corruption: Invalid length of binary data with TransactionId '': 0 (expected 16) #11213

Closed
def- opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/bug This issue is a bug

Comments

@def-
Copy link
Contributor

def- commented Jan 25, 2022

Description

Found a sporadic failure, can be reproduced by running the query a few times:

select
  ref_0.mapcfg as c0
from
  pg_catalog.pg_ts_config_map as ref_0
where true
limit 108
 for share
;

Fails with

ERROR:  Corruption: Invalid length of binary data with TransactionId '': 0 (expected 16)

The expected failure that happens mostly is:

ERROR:  Not implemented: Read request with row mark types must be part of a transaction

Can anyone confirm that the Corruption is a bug? Based on the word "corruption", I assume it should be looked at.

Found with SQLsmith while looking for something unrelated.

@def- def- added the area/docdb YugabyteDB core features label Jan 25, 2022
@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor

bmatican commented Jan 25, 2022

@spolitov could this be related to #11066 ?

@sergei
Copy link

sergei commented Jan 25, 2022

Wrong Sergei 😉

@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor

sorry about that... shame face

@def- def- added the kind/bug This issue is a bug label Jan 26, 2022
@def- def- changed the title util/uuid: ERROR: Corruption: Invalid length of binary data with TransactionId '': 0 (expected 16) [DocDB][SQLsmith] util/uuid: ERROR: Corruption: Invalid length of binary data with TransactionId '': 0 (expected 16) Feb 3, 2022
@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor

Since #11066 was fixed, can you still repro this @def- ?
If not, let's close this out.

@def-
Copy link
Contributor Author

def- commented Feb 22, 2022

Yes, now I consistently get:

ERROR:  Not implemented: Read request with row mark types must be part of a transaction: OPERATION_NOT_SUPPORTED

@def- def- closed this as completed Feb 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/bug This issue is a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants