You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Massive thanks for this great tool and it works absolutely fine with my data. In the paper, you mentioned that you experimented with different values of k to create the k-gram sequences. What metric would you recommend to evaluate these clusters?
For e.g. if I experiment with k -> [1,2,3,4,5] I would have 5 set of results (assuming I dont include time gaps at this stage, as that would double the number of results). How would I decide which clustering is the best? Is it simply the modularity score? If yes, each cluster has a modularity value but is there a way to amalgamate that for an entire set of results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Massive thanks for this great tool and it works absolutely fine with my data. In the paper, you mentioned that you experimented with different values of
k
to create the k-gram sequences. What metric would you recommend to evaluate these clusters?For e.g. if I experiment with k -> [1,2,3,4,5] I would have 5 set of results (assuming I dont include time gaps at this stage, as that would double the number of results). How would I decide which clustering is the best? Is it simply the modularity score? If yes, each cluster has a modularity value but is there a way to amalgamate that for an entire set of results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: