Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cluster quality results? #15

Open
gmobile15 opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Cluster quality results? #15

gmobile15 opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@gmobile15
Copy link

Hi,

Massive thanks for this great tool and it works absolutely fine with my data. In the paper, you mentioned that you experimented with different values of k to create the k-gram sequences. What metric would you recommend to evaluate these clusters?

For e.g. if I experiment with k -> [1,2,3,4,5] I would have 5 set of results (assuming I dont include time gaps at this stage, as that would double the number of results). How would I decide which clustering is the best? Is it simply the modularity score? If yes, each cluster has a modularity value but is there a way to amalgamate that for an entire set of results?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant