Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compatibility with Roms-Agrif/CROCO versions #24

Open
ana-machado opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

compatibility with Roms-Agrif/CROCO versions #24

ana-machado opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@ana-machado
Copy link

Hello,
I just accidentally found your code, and it seems really useful! I am a CROCO/ROMS-Agrif user, do you know if your code is compatible with its outputs? Most things are similar, but since there are some differences in the name of variables, and sigma coordinates, would it deal with it correctly?
Thank you for developing and sharing such useful tools.
Cheers
Ana Machado

@claudiofgcardoso
Copy link

Hi Ana,
From my experience, xroms is compatible with CROCO outputs. I only had one issue: because my CROCO outputs aren't saved with all variables, I needed to add the necessary "grid" variables to the daily/monthly netCDF outputs for xroms readability.

Cheers,
Claudio

@kthyng
Copy link
Contributor

kthyng commented Oct 28, 2022

Hi @ana-machado and @claudiofgcardoso! First, sorry for my delay in responding. I didn't have notifications set up and didn't realize issues had come in.
Second, I've just learned about CROCO from @jaard and I got the impression that indeed xroms should work with CROCO output, and also that @jaard has a package specifically for CROCO called xcroco.

@kthyng
Copy link
Contributor

kthyng commented May 24, 2023

Hi again @ana-machado! I've recently put out a new version to PyPI (v0.2.4, still coming through on conda-forge). If you get a chance to try this package again with your output, it'd be great to hear about. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants