Replies: 1 comment
-
Nice work on your library! This repo isn't really actively maintained although @aaronspring chips in now and then. I'm open to what you think is best. We can either point people towards scoringrules is you think that's preferred. We can also have integration like you suggested. I've most been providing references toward stuff I find interesting e.g. #284 (comment) as I don't have the time to work on this library but I am happy to brain storm/review code if you are willing to put in a PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all! 👋
I have recently published scoringrules, a library for probabilistic forecasts evaluation. Compared to
properscoring
it adds more metrics (including multivariate and weighted metrics), is thoroughly documented and will be actively maintained.Would the maintainers here be open to integrating
scoringrules
as the main "backend" library for computing probabilistic scores? If yes, it would be great if we could meet and discuss the best way to do that.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions