Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code table 4.5: convective cloud level (UK) #91

Closed
marqh opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 12 comments
Closed

code table 4.5: convective cloud level (UK) #91

marqh opened this issue Mar 31, 2021 · 12 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@marqh
Copy link
Member

marqh commented Mar 31, 2021

Branch

https://github.com/wmo-im/GRIB2/tree/issue91

Summary and purpose

Request for a new code table 4.5 entries for convective cloud level

Action proposed

The Team is requested to review the proposed new parameter and approve it for implementation.

Discussions

The UK Met Office generates data from its atmosphere models on surfaces of convective cloud levels, which do not appear in the current GRIB parameter code tables. The representation these quantity within WMO GRIB2 tables would assist in the sharing of this data.

  • Name: Convective cloud layer bottom level
  • Name: Convective cloud layer top level
  • See attached document for details of the new entries -
    GRIB-CC-4.5.docx

Final proposal

(edited by @jitsukoh July 2)
New entries in Code Table 4.5
26: Convective cloud layer base
27: Convective cloud layer top

28 - 29 Reserved

@marqh
Copy link
Member Author

marqh commented Mar 31, 2021

@richardweedon
@mgange659

@amilan17 amilan17 changed the title convective cloud level (UK) code table 4.5: convective cloud level (UK) Apr 20, 2021
@amilan17 amilan17 added this to the FT-2021-1 milestone Apr 21, 2021
@jitsukoh
Copy link

@amilan17 was this issue closed?

@amilan17 amilan17 modified the milestones: FT-2021-1, FT-2021-2 May 17, 2021
@amilan17
Copy link
Member

apologies. Didn't mean to close the issue.

@richardweedon
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in attached document request the following - 26: Convective cloud layer bottom. 27: Convective Cloud Layer Top. Reserved entries re-numbered to '28 - 29 Reserved

@jitsukoh
Copy link

@richardweedon you don't need to close the issue and also you should be the assignee.
Please update the original post of this issue with the final proposal, without using the word document, which saves a lot of work for the Secretariat.

@jitsukoh jitsukoh reopened this May 27, 2021
@jitsukoh
Copy link

@richardweedon I updated the original post with the final proposal. Can you update the branch?

@jitsukoh
Copy link

@amilan17 I confirm that the proposal is finalized and the branch is updated. This issue is moved to validated status.

@amilan17
Copy link
Member

@jitsukoh @richardweedon -- I just want confirmation that "level" is supposed to be in the meaning column

  • 26, Convective cloud layer bottom level 
  • 27, Convective cloud layer top level

@jitsukoh
Copy link

@amilan17 @richardweedon I think both work w/ and wo/ but I leave this to Met Office' decision.

@marqh
Copy link
Member Author

marqh commented Jul 1, 2021

Hello All

having reviewed this proposal, the Met Office are happy to remove the term level from the definitions, this seems more consistent with the other entries

we are also wary that the use of the term bottom is not consistent with other code table entries. the term cloud base has eight matches in the manual on codes, where as the term cloud bottom has zero matches

cloud base seems the preferred term for WMO.

So, we would like to propose that this is revised to define:

  • 26, Convective cloud layer base
  • 27, Convective cloud layer top

@jitsukoh
Copy link

jitsukoh commented Jul 2, 2021

@marqh I agree with your suggestion. I updated the original post with the proposal. Can you update the branch accordingly?

@amilan17
Copy link
Member

amilan17 commented Jul 4, 2021

@marq I will update the content in the FT branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants