Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Related work #55

Open
lilith opened this issue Oct 12, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Related work #55

lilith opened this issue Oct 12, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@lilith
Copy link

lilith commented Oct 12, 2016

There might be fundamental differences between notty's approach and iTerm2's image handling, but either way, given there are at least two terminals with image support, there may be a chance for collaboration?

I do a lot of command-line image work, and it would be cool if I could support notty and iTerm both with the same protocol, although this is not a strong need.

@withoutboats
Copy link
Owner

The protocol is different but the fundamental approach is basically the same (unlike, for example, Terminology, which uses a file/URL based approach). I'll consider adding special support for iTerm2's image command.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants