Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TTL support for Netlify adapter for On Demand Builders #6654

Closed
1 task done
cassidoo opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #7975
Closed
1 task done

Add TTL support for Netlify adapter for On Demand Builders #6654

cassidoo opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #7975
Labels
- P2: nice to have Not breaking anything but nice to have (priority) feat: ssr Related to SSR (scope)

Comments

@cassidoo
Copy link
Contributor

cassidoo commented Mar 25, 2023

What version of astro are you using?

2.1.5

Are you using an SSR adapter? If so, which one?

Netlify

Describe the Feature

The Netlify On Demand Builders adapter should support Time To Live (TTL):

https://docs.netlify.com/configure-builds/on-demand-builders/#time-to-live-ttl

Relevant PR: #5874

Participation

  • I am willing to submit a pull request for this issue (but I won't be hurt if someone beats me to it)
@matthewp matthewp added the - P2: nice to have Not breaking anything but nice to have (priority) label Mar 27, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @cassidoo. Please provide a minimal reproduction using a GitHub repository or StackBlitz. Issues marked with needs: repro will be closed if they have no activity within 3 days.

@natemoo-re
Copy link
Member

Uh oh... rogue bot!

@natemoo-re
Copy link
Member

Apologies for the notifications @cassidoo! Trying the label action again...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
- P2: nice to have Not breaking anything but nice to have (priority) feat: ssr Related to SSR (scope)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants