Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

From the perspective of diffusion model principle, why are the representations generated by DDPM from remote sensing images more robust and distinguishable than those obtained by UNet networks? #44

Open
ZhiyuLong0328 opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ZhiyuLong0328
Copy link

Hello. Your article DDPM-CD has been very helpful to me, and I have a question I would like to discuss with you. The question is as follow.

From the perspective of diffusion model principle, why are the representations generated by DDPM from remote sensing images more robust and distinguishable than those obtained by UNet networks?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Sincerely yours.

@jehovahxu
Copy link

I don't understand either. When T is large enough, the feature is approximate to gaussian noise. It is very different to use an auto-encoder such as UNet directly. So it is hard to understand why the image representations can be extracted from gaussion noise in the diffusion process.

@ZhiyuLong0328
Copy link
Author

Can you understand why multi-time step features are more effective for change detection tasks than single-step feature? What additional information can it extract, and why are multiple time steps mutually reinforcing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants