-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(items): new item #647
fix(items): new item #647
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
data/warnings.json (1)
1-10
: Consider automating the warnings.json maintenance.The manual maintenance of missing assets can be error-prone. Consider implementing an automated system that:
- Periodically checks for missing assets
- Updates this file automatically
- Creates reports for newly missing or resolved items
This would improve accuracy and reduce maintenance overhead.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
data/warnings.json
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
data/warnings.json (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Addition of "Helminth" to missingImage array is properly formatted.
The new entry maintains consistency with existing entries and follows the array's alphabetical ordering.
9-9
: Verify the removal of wiki thumbnails.
A significant number of entries have been removed from the missingWikiThumb array. Please verify that these removals are intentional and that the corresponding wiki thumbnails are now available.
Let's verify the existence of some removed thumbnails:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the git history, I can now generate the final response:
Removals from missingWikiThumb array appear intentional
The changes were part of a recent commit that shows a deliberate curation of the missingWikiThumb list. The removed entries (like "Valkyr Prime Talons", "Venka Prime", etc.) were specifically taken out while maintaining other entries, suggesting this was an intentional update to reflect items that now have wiki thumbnails.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the wiki API returns thumbnails for some of the removed entries
# Note: This is a sample check for a few entries to validate the changes
# Using curl to check wiki API for some removed entries
for item in "Dark Sword" "Destreza Prime" "Dex Nikana"; do
echo "Checking $item..."
curl -s "https://warframe.fandom.com/api.php?action=query&titles=$item&prop=imageinfo&iiprop=url&format=json" | jq .
done
Length of output: 719
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach by checking the git history of this file
# to see when and why these entries were removed
# Check the git history of the warnings.json file
git log -p data/warnings.json | head -n 100
Length of output: 11829
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1265.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
What did you fix?
Add new items because I thought release actions ran builds too
Reproduction steps
Evidence/screenshot/link to line
Considerations
Summary by CodeRabbit