feat: added RailJack turrets #644
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the categorization and data handling of weapon and upgrade items within the application. A new condition is added to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
build/scraper.mjs (2)
96-97: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The implementation correctly adds both regular weapons and Railjack weapons to the data array, addressing the gap in available weapon data as mentioned in the PR objectives.
Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this addition:
// Include both regular weapons and Railjack weapons in the data array if (category === 'Weapons') data.push(...raw.ExportWeapons, ...raw.ExportRailjackWeapons);
Line range hint
98-104: LGTM! Consider consistent type assignment for all upgrade items.The implementation correctly adds various types of upgrades to the data array and improves data categorization by adding a 'type' property to mod sets.
For consistency, consider adding type properties to avionics and focus upgrades as well:
if (category === 'Upgrades') { const modSets = raw.ExportModSet.map((modSet) => ({ ...modSet, type: 'Mod Set' })); const avionics = raw.ExportAvionics.map((avionic) => ({ ...avionic, type: 'Avionic' })); const focusUpgrades = raw.ExportFocusUpgrades.map((upgrade) => ({ ...upgrade, type: 'Focus Upgrade' })); data.push(...modSets, ...avionics, ...focusUpgrades); }This approach ensures that all upgrade items have a consistent structure with a 'type' property.
build/parser.mjs (2)
655-655: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the condition
else if (item.slot === 14) item.category = 'Railjack';correctly implements the categorization of Railjack turrets as per the PR objective. This change is consistent with the existing structure and logic of the method.Consider adding a brief comment explaining that slot 14 corresponds to Railjack turrets. This would improve code readability and make it easier for future maintainers to understand the significance of this specific slot number. For example:
+ // Slot 14 corresponds to Railjack turrets else if (item.slot === 14) item.category = 'Railjack';
Line range hint
1-1026: Consider future refactoring opportunities (not required for this PR).The Parser class is quite complex with numerous methods and responsibilities. While not directly related to this PR, future improvements could include:
- Breaking down large methods (e.g.,
filter,addComponents) into smaller, more focused functions.- Adding more inline documentation to explain complex logic.
- Considering the use of TypeScript for improved type safety and self-documentation.
These suggestions are for future consideration and are not necessary for the current PR.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- build/parser.mjs (1 hunks)
- build/scraper.mjs (1 hunks)
- config/itemTypes.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
build/scraper.mjs (1)
Line range hint
96-104: Overall, the changes effectively address the PR objectives.The modifications to the
fetchResourcesmethod successfully include Railjack turrets in the weapon data and enhance item categorization for upgrades. The implementation is correct, uses modern JavaScript features, and maintains good code quality.Consider the minor suggestions provided in the previous comments to further improve clarity and consistency.
config/itemTypes.json (3)
1024-1028: New entry for Railjack Turret looks good!The new entry for "Railjack Turret" has been added correctly:
- It follows the existing format and structure of other entries.
- The placement within the array seems logical, as it's near other weapon-related entries.
- The
regexflag is set totrue, which is appropriate for matching multiple items.- The name "Railjack Turret" is clear and consistent with the naming convention used in other entries.
- This addition aligns with the PR objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data.
Line range hint
1-1028: LGTM! File structure and content are well-maintained.The addition of the Railjack Turret entry maintains the overall structure and consistency of the
itemTypes.jsonfile. The file continues to provide a comprehensive and well-organized list of item types for various game elements.
1024-1028: Verify integration with existing item type handlingWhile the new entry for "Railjack Turret" is correctly formatted and placed, it's important to ensure it integrates smoothly with the rest of the system:
- There don't appear to be any direct conflicts with existing entries, but it's worth double-checking that no other entry uses a similar pattern that might cause unexpected categorization.
- The addition of this new item type might require updates in other parts of the codebase that handle item categorization or display.
- Any parsing or filtering logic that relies on item types should be reviewed to ensure it can handle this new category correctly.
To confirm the proper integration of this new item type, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential conflicts in item type definitions, files that might need updating to handle the new item type, and any existing references to Railjack turrets that might need adjustment.
build/parser.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-1026: Summary: PR successfully implements Railjack turret categorization.The changes in this PR effectively address the stated objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data. The implementation is minimal and focused, integrating well with the existing code structure. While there are opportunities for future refactoring to improve the overall code quality, these are not necessary for the current PR.
Overall, the changes look good and achieve the desired outcome without introducing unnecessary complexity or potential issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
index.d.ts (4)
65-70: Clarify the use of 'SentinelWeapons' in 'ItemsOptions.category'.The property
categoryis defined asArray<Category | 'SentinelWeapons'>. Since'SentinelWeapons'is already included in theCategorytype as per line 693, including it separately may be redundant. Consider removing'SentinelWeapons'from the union type for clarity.
276-280: Unused property 'buffSet' in 'ModSet' interface.The property
buffSetis set totrue, but it's unclear how it is used within the application. If this property is not utilized, consider removing it to simplify the interface.
675-694: Redundancy in 'Category' type definition.The
Categorytype includes both explicit categories andWeapon['category'], which may overlap with already listed categories like 'Primary', 'Secondary', etc. Consider consolidating the categories to avoid duplication.
386-455: 'Component' interface has many optional properties, leading to potential complexity.The
Componentinterface includes numerous optional properties, some of which may not be relevant to all components. Evaluate if the interface can be broken down into more specific interfaces or if some properties can be moved to more appropriate interfaces to enhance maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
index.d.ts (4)
243-253: Ensure consistency of 'tradable' property in 'Arcane' interface.The
Arcaneinterface explicitly setstradable: true, but since it doesn't extendDroppablelike other items, it might be missing other properties related to drops and tradability. Verify whetherArcaneshould extendDroppableto maintain consistency across tradable items.
302-318: Potential deprecation warning for 'isUtility' in 'Mod' interface.There's a comment indicating that
isUtilityis deprecated and possibly replaced byisExilus. Ensure that any references toisUtilityare updated toisExilusthroughout the codebase to avoid confusion.
918-939: Update 'SystemName' to include any new star chart locations.Ensure that the
SystemNametype includes all current locations in the game's star chart. If new systems have been added since this code was written, they should be included to keep the type up to date.
704-705: Confirm all projectile types are accounted for in 'Projectile' type.The
Projectiletype includes 'Discharge', 'Hitscan', 'Projectile', and 'Thrown'. Verify that there are no additional projectile types needed, such as 'Beam' or 'Continuous', to ensure comprehensive type coverage.✅ Verification successful
All projectile types are accounted for in the 'Projectile' type.
- The
Projectiletype includes additional categories:Common,Uncommon,Rare, andLegendary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all unique values assigned to the 'projectile' property in the codebase. rg "projectile: ['\"][^'\"]+['\"]" -o | sed -E "s/.*['\"]([^'\"]+)['\"].*/\1/" | sort | uniqLength of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Enhanced search for all unique values assigned to the 'projectile' property in the codebase. # This script accounts for possible variations in spacing and different quotation marks. rg -i "projectile\s*:\s*['\"][^'\"]+['\"]" -o | sed -E "s/.*['\"]([^'\"]+)['\"].*/\1/" | sort | uniqLength of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract all defined values within the 'Projectile' type from index.d.ts rg -A 5 "type Projectile" index.d.ts | grep -oE "'[^']+'" | sed "s/'//g" | sort | uniqLength of output: 175
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
index.d.ts (1)
23-27: Consider adding JSDoc comments for the Items classThe
Itemsclass extendsArray<Item>and includes additional properties. To improve documentation, consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of this class and its properties, especially theoptionsandi18nfields.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
index.d.ts (4)
3-21: LGTM: ColorMap and RawColors interfaces look well-definedThe
ColorMapandRawColorsinterfaces are clearly defined and provide a good structure for color-related data in the Warframe context. The use of optional properties allows for flexibility in color definitions.
29-32: LGTM: ModResolveable, Palette, PaletteEntry, and Pixel interfaces are well-structuredThese interfaces provide a clear structure for mod-related data, color palettes, and pixel information. The
Pixelclass, in particular, has a good set of methods for working with color data.Also applies to: 34-49, 51-63
72-97: LGTM: Comprehensive Item type definitionThe
Itemtype union covers a wide range of item types in the game, providing good type coverage for various scenarios.
1-941: Overall assessment: Well-structured with room for improvementThe
index.d.tsfile provides a comprehensive set of type definitions for the Warframe game items and related concepts. It offers a solid foundation for type-safe development within the module. However, there are several opportunities to enhance the code:
- Implement enums for string literal unions (e.g.,
ModType,Polarity) to improve type safety and maintainability.- Use interface extension and generics to reduce duplication in related interfaces, particularly for weapon-related types.
- Break down large union types (e.g.,
Type) into smaller, more manageable categories.- Add JSDoc comments to improve documentation, especially for complex types and classes.
- Make small adjustments for consistency and correctness, such as making
fusionPointsoptional in theResourceinterface.Implementing these changes will result in a more robust, maintainable, and developer-friendly type definition file.
Railjack weapons are the same regardless of the mark or house
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
data/cache/.images.json (1)
57326-57905: Approve the addition of CrewShip weapon data with suggestions for improvementThe addition of CrewShip weapon data is comprehensive and well-structured. It aligns with the PR objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data. However, I have a few suggestions for potential improvements:
Consider using a more compact representation for the repetitive data. For example, you could group weapons by type and tier, reducing redundancy.
Verify the consistency of hash values within weapon types. While this appears intentional, it's worth confirming that identical hashes for different tiers of the same weapon type are correct.
The
isComponentfield is consistently set tofalsefor all entries. If this is always the case for CrewShip weapons, consider omitting this field to reduce data size, or document why it's necessary to explicitly set it tofalse.Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (11)
data/img/apoc.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/bahul-decoy.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/carcinnox.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/cryophon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/glazio.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/jasvin-smoke.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/laith.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/photor.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/pulsar.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/talyn.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdata/img/vort.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- build/parser.mjs (3 hunks)
- data/cache/.images.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
data/cache/.images.json (1)
57326-57905: Summary: Approve the CrewShip weapon data additions with suggestionsThe additions to
data/cache/.images.jsonsuccessfully implement the PR objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data. The structure is consistent and comprehensive, covering various weapon types, manufacturers, and tiers.Key points:
- The data structure is well-organized and consistent.
- All entries include the required fields:
uniqueName,hash, andisComponent.- The additions cover multiple weapon types, manufacturers (Lavan, Vidar, Zekti), and tiers (A, B, C).
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider a more compact data representation to reduce redundancy.
- Verify the intentional use of identical hashes for different tiers of the same weapon type.
- Evaluate the necessity of the
isComponentfield, which is consistently set tofalse.- Run the provided verification script to ensure completeness of the weapon data.
Overall, this is a solid addition to the weapon data, aligning well with the PR objectives. Please consider the suggestions for potential optimizations and verifications.
build/parser.mjs (2)
Line range hint
542-581: LGTM. Verify impact on existing image naming conventions.The new conditions for 'Arcane', 'Blueprint', and 'CrewShipWeapons' items improve the image naming logic. These changes align with the PR objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data.
To ensure these changes don't unintentionally affect other items, please run the following script:
670-670: LGTM. Verify consistency with existing weapon categories.The new condition for categorizing items with slot value 14 as 'Railjack' aligns with the PR objective of including Railjack turrets in the weapon data.
To ensure this categorization is consistent and doesn't conflict with existing categories, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Railjack category assignment verified and consistent.
The new condition categorizing items with slot value 14 as 'Railjack' aligns with existing weapon categorization logic and does not conflict with other categories.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in weapon categorization # Test: Look for other occurrences of slot-based categorization rg "item\.slot\s*===?\s*\d+" -A 5 # Test: Check for any existing 'Railjack' categories rg "category\s*=\s*['\"]\s*Railjack" -A 5Length of output: 1479
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1264.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
What did you fix?
Include Railjack turrets in weapon data, only turrets seem to be available in the export
Reproduction steps
Evidence/screenshot/link to line
Considerations
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation