Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider linking funder entities to CrossRef's Funder Registry #25

Open
rossmounce opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Consider linking funder entities to CrossRef's Funder Registry #25

rossmounce opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@rossmounce
Copy link
Contributor

rossmounce commented Jul 13, 2017

One can't just assume that "NSF" is the US one. Could be Iran's, Georgia's, or Sri Lanka's.

https://www.crossref.org/services/content-registration/funding-data/

@ethanwhite
Copy link
Member

Great point. Thanks @rossmounce. Will see what I can do about improving that.

@dhimmel
Copy link
Contributor

dhimmel commented Oct 7, 2019

Is the Crossref Funder Agency still the best standardized terminology for funders?

@rossmounce is there a site where we can look up funder IDs? Or a place to download the dataset in bulk?

@rossmounce
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dhimmel I'm hoping it's all at the following link, but have not fully inspected it myself... https://gitlab.com/crossref/open_funder_registry

explained here: https://www.crossref.org/services/funder-registry/

@martijnvanbeers
Copy link

This issue is pretty old, and I believe in the meanwhile ROR has been getting traction, and crossref are planning to phase out their registry in favour of ROR. I'm not sure if it's fully integrated yet, but many funders are already in ROR anyway

@ethanwhite
Copy link
Member

I'm happy for this to shift to ROR if that's the better current source and welcome related PRs if anyone was time/energy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants