You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems the rhumb syntax is more or less compatible with URI templates, however the latter offers additional semantics such as value modifiers. These can be handy to describe how things should be parsed, but also the other way around – how things should be expanded into a new URI given input parameters. It's probably not the remit of rhumb to deal with this, since its purpose is that of pattern matching and routing, URI parsing is more of a dependency. It might be worth looking into whether the parsing/expansion can be done by something like URIt instead. (Shameless plug, I know.)
From @mstade on September 18, 2015 10:49
It seems the rhumb syntax is more or less compatible with URI templates, however the latter offers additional semantics such as value modifiers. These can be handy to describe how things should be parsed, but also the other way around – how things should be expanded into a new URI given input parameters. It's probably not the remit of rhumb to deal with this, since its purpose is that of pattern matching and routing, URI parsing is more of a dependency. It might be worth looking into whether the parsing/expansion can be done by something like URIt instead. (Shameless plug, I know.)
Copied from original issue: sammyt/rhumb#14
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: