Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: styleTagTransform function path added to buildDependencies #528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2021

Conversation

cap-Bernardito
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

When the styleTagTransform option is an absolute path to a function, it is added to the buildDependencies

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #528 (acb8280) into master (a0ee2e0) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #528      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.93%   94.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         296      297       +1     
  Branches      146      146              
==========================================
+ Hits          281      282       +1     
  Misses         15       15              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/utils.js 92.90% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a0ee2e0...acb8280. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 270513f into master Jul 20, 2021
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the fix-styletagtransform-build-deps branch July 20, 2021 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants