You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We used Helixer to predict genes in plant genome assemblies we have constructed. Approximately 30k genes were often predicted and complete BUSCO scores are always >95%. It seems prediction accuracy is very high. However, recently, we found ~30% genes predicted by Helixer had single-base exons or two-base. -- it may be micro exons. I am wondering such micro exons are frequently found in plant genomes. Or, do we need to customize parameters to eliminate them?
Here is an example with a single-base exon at 1519:
Thanks for the feedback. Microexons are not expected in plant genomes at the frequency Helixer predicts them and these are very likely predictive mistakes. It's a known challenge spot/issue for Helixer and occurs especially where there is a high level of uncertainty in the raw predictions. Unfortunately I don't have a quick parameter fix. Maybe increasing the --peak-thresholdto improve the overall precision would help some. Hopefully we'll have have a better solution in the future.
Hi,
We used Helixer to predict genes in plant genome assemblies we have constructed. Approximately 30k genes were often predicted and complete BUSCO scores are always >95%. It seems prediction accuracy is very high. However, recently, we found ~30% genes predicted by Helixer had single-base exons or two-base. -- it may be micro exons. I am wondering such micro exons are frequently found in plant genomes. Or, do we need to customize parameters to eliminate them?
Here is an example with a single-base exon at 1519:
Thanks,
Kenta
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: