You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have tried almost all versions of jsartoolkit5 and ar.js .
it seems that moving to your "new positioning" method for tracking , makes movement of overlay object a little weired .
Now , object or image or video , seems not sticking to the target and continuesly moving by camera's movement .
i think this is far from the concept of augmented reality which is must the overlay object stick on target and move exactly with target movement .
but I have tried your approach for "new filtering with worker" and it was really better than other methods .
thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @YMZnew , welcome to JsartoolkitnFT!
Nice that you have tried/tested the code, what do you mean with new positioning? and with new filtering with worker?
Hi @kalwalt , i have reviewed your method on ARnft and
nftLoader . I have tried and your threejs_filter_worker and compare it to your other methods . its performance in repositioning was much better than other and your other approaches .
i've also tried your ARnft repo but it I think your repositioning in that sample makes so much delay on moving camera . infact, the overlay 3d cube will be moved to next position slowly and not matching the target .
Im developing my own wasm ar based on opencv and worker and my main problem was fps .
maybe using nft images and markers will improve my fps for detection
I have tried almost all versions of jsartoolkit5 and ar.js .
it seems that moving to your "new positioning" method for tracking , makes movement of overlay object a little weired .
Now , object or image or video , seems not sticking to the target and continuesly moving by camera's movement .
i think this is far from the concept of augmented reality which is must the overlay object stick on target and move exactly with target movement .
but I have tried your approach for "new filtering with worker" and it was really better than other methods .
thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: