Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Carryover evaluation: CSS Pseudo-classes #463

Closed
foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Carryover evaluation: CSS Pseudo-classes #463

foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: CSS Pseudo-classes

Comments

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Sep 21, 2023

Let's evaluate whether to continue the CSS Pseudo-classes focus area in Interop 2024.

Original proposals:

Tests:

We should also consider whether we should add tests for 2024.

@foolip foolip added carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: CSS Pseudo-classes labels Sep 21, 2023
@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Sep 22, 2023

For what it's worth, I'm adding quite a few tests for :dir() as part of https://crbug.com/576815 (though unfortunately the linked WPT PRs are 3 clicks away from that -- via the different chromium-review.googlesource.com links and a comment by the export bot that links to the WPT PR), which I expect will show a bunch of bugs in other engines. There's also some ongoing related spec work, mostly to specify the behavior described in whatwg/html#3699 (comment) via whatwg/html#9554 / whatwg/html#9796 / etc. (That said, it's not super-clear how important those bugs are relative to the demand for the original feature, though it may depend on what they are.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carryover-evaluation Evaluate whether to continue a focus area in the next year focus area: CSS Pseudo-classes
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants