Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Host detail panel needs improvement #910

Closed
pidster opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Host detail panel needs improvement #910

pidster opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pidster
Copy link
Contributor

pidster commented Feb 3, 2016

host-details

There's a link in the header "default" under the title "Default" that doesn't do anything. This should be removed.

The networks listed in the info table are truncated.

The current ordering of parts in the Host detail panel is:

  • Status: sparklines
  • Status: info table
  • Container image list
  • Containers
  • Applications

In my case, this places a long list of (in some cases dormant)
container images above the list of containers that are actually running. What problem does this solve?

This whole panel needs a rethink.

@paulbellamy
Copy link
Contributor

There's a link in the header "default" under the title "Default" that doesn't do anything. This should be removed.

That's a bug

The networks listed in the info table are truncated.

Sure, we could move them to a separate table, but most of the info you need from this might be contained in a set of connection summary information.

Container image list is not useful (or less useful than others)

Agreed

This whole panel needs a rethink.

Seems like an overreaction

@tomwilkie
Copy link
Contributor

There's a link in the header "default" under the title "Default" that doesn't do anything. This should be removed.

#917

The networks listed in the info table are truncated.

#927 - not obvious what to do here (separate table vs something else) so broken it out on to another ticket for discussion.

Container image list is not useful (or less useful than others)

#923

@tomwilkie tomwilkie added this to the 0.13.0 milestone Feb 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants