Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repository website link returns 404 #1

Open
JohnVonNeumann opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Repository website link returns 404 #1

JohnVonNeumann opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@JohnVonNeumann
Copy link

Hey there! I've been reading through the specs recently and trying to understand the framework, loving the work. This is only a small thing, nothing too major, but figured for usability and enabling people to read and understand the project more, working links could be useful.

image

image

The website link returns a 404.

@zeitgeist
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @JohnVonNeumann, you are right. We are missing an index.html in this repository (+ a way to link to the published documents of course)

If you are looking for an overview and some pointers, this might be helpful: https://wbcsd.github.io/introduction/

@JohnVonNeumann
Copy link
Author

Hey @zeitgeist

Is this something you'd like someone else to handle or would you rather do it yourself? Obviously I cannot change the actual link on the page as I am not a maintainer.

Thanks for the link, I've been spending some time recently making sense of the Pathfinder Network docs for V2 and also some of the Use Case 001 docs too, I'm finding it very interesting.

@zeitgeist
Copy link
Contributor

zeitgeist commented Mar 5, 2023

@JohnVonNeumann Thank you for your reply. WRT the introduction, I'd be really interested in your feedback; i.e. how approachable it is, whether something is missing, etc.

WRT to the link: we could update the link to point to one of the specifications, but what I think we need is at least a listing of the released tech specs; and that in the best case this happens automatically. Do you have an idea how we can best achieve this?

@JohnVonNeumann
Copy link
Author

I'll have a sit down with the introduction soon, I had a cursory glance today and only really saw some grammatical stuff that I'd tune up, but I should mention that my background is not in well specified or scientific programming domains, so I can give a review but I can't claim expertise in spec review.

Regarding the links, I could probably figure something out without much issue.

I'll get back to you soon when I have a spare moment to read through the introduction.

I'd also be interested in a chat sometime if you have the time, be interested in under the project from someone who is at the coal face. If that's possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants