Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

describe principles for naming of locking/unlocking APIs #85

Open
dbaron opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

describe principles for naming of locking/unlocking APIs #85

dbaron opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Status: In Progress We're working on it but ideas not fully formed yet. Topic: JS Topic: Naming

Comments

@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented Feb 1, 2018

Starting from w3ctag/design-reviews#192 (comment) we had some discussion of naming of locking/unlocking APIs. This may also be related to w3ctag/design-reviews#217 .

We should probably document the principles for naming and ergonomics of locking/unlocking APIs, given the number of patterns we've observed already.

@garykac
Copy link

garykac commented Mar 3, 2018

I just added a comment about the naming of the Keyboard Lock API.
w3ctag/design-reviews#192 (comment)

Basically, we're modeling it after the Screen Orientation API and having a object navigator.keyboard with lock and unlock methods.

@torgo torgo added Status: Consensus to write We have TAG consensus about the principle but someone needs to write it (see "To Write" project) Status: In Progress We're working on it but ideas not fully formed yet. and removed Status: Consensus to write We have TAG consensus about the principle but someone needs to write it (see "To Write" project) labels Apr 6, 2018
@plinss plinss added this to the 2021-02-01-week milestone Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: In Progress We're working on it but ideas not fully formed yet. Topic: JS Topic: Naming
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants