New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using QUIC and/or HTTP/3 #84

Open

mmccool opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 0 comments

Labels

DID

Contributor

mmccool commented Oct 13, 2020 •

edited

Loading

May be easier to handle certificate exchange; parts pulled into HTTP/3.
We could make this mandatory; should we?

mmccool added the DID label

mmccool changed the title ~~Consider using QUIC~~ Consider using QUIC and/or HTTP/3

mmccool added the defer to Discovery 2.0 label

mmccool removed the defer to Discovery 2.0 label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment