-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should we add captureTimestamp senderCaptureTimeOffset to the RTCEncodedXXXFrameMetadata if abs-capture-time is used? #225
Comments
+1 would be great to have. I'd say it should ~always be exposed for locally captured frames, like how we have for requestVideoFrameCallback, and exposed for remote frames if and only if the abs-capture-time is sent. @Orphis FYI |
It would also be useful to add the |
cc @tonyherre |
This issue had an associated resolution in WebRTC Interim, May 21st – 21 May 2024 (Issue 225: Add captureTimestamp senderCaptureTimeOffset to the encoded frame metadata):
|
In the https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/ we define the
captureTimestamp
andsenderCaptureTimeOffset
at contribution source level, however this information is available on a per frame level too.I believe it would be interesting to be able to expose the same both values in the
RTCEncodedAudioFrameMetadata
andRTCEncodedVideoFrameMetadata
when the abs capture time header extension is used.Related: PR 137
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: