-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax #111
Comments
This is a pretty trivial change, but Bikeshed throws fatal errors when parsing the new IDL syntax:
It looks like you've already filed speced/bikeshed#1124, so I'll just wait for that to get fixed before addressing this. |
Friendly ping. |
@mikewest or other WG members, another friendly ping. speced/bikeshed#1124 is fixed, and this is blocking a couple of other projects that want to get rid of "implements". Could you kindly make this change. |
Hi all!
WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins.
This syntax replaces the
[NoInterfaceObject]
extended attribute andimplements statement
which have been deprecated (except for a few legacy uses cases explicitely mentioned in the spec).You can read more about it here.
In most cases, the changes should be relatively straightforward. The now deprecated:
should just be rewritten as:
Additonaly, a section on when to use partials and mixins has been added to the spec. It's short and might be worth a read.
It seems the following interfaces in this spec are impacted by this change:
We're sorry for the inconvenience this causes, but our hope is that this ultimately makes things simpler and clearer for everybody.
As always, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Tracked in: whatwg/webidl#472 | Original pull-request: whatwg/webidl#433
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: