Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Randomization #41

Closed
OR13 opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Randomization #41

OR13 opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
before-CR This issue needs to be resolved before the Candidate Recommendation phase. pr exists

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Jan 26, 2023

Should bitstring be initialized randomly, (reduces compression).

Should bitstring be consumed randomly, (implementation burden on the issuer).
@dlongley
Copy link
Contributor

My initial vote is for the latter (issuers should assign indexes in a pseudo-random fashion).

There are probably a lot of use cases where very few bits would be flipped -- and it would probably be significantly more costly across an ecosystem and over time to increase the size of lists vs. requiring implementers to do a bit more work (ideally once).

@msporny msporny added the before-CR This issue needs to be resolved before the Candidate Recommendation phase. label Sep 10, 2023
@OR13 OR13 mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2023
Merged
@OR13 OR13 added the pr exists label Oct 31, 2023
@OR13 OR13 mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2023
Closed
@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Dec 28, 2023

PR #92 has been merged, closing.

@msporny msporny closed this as completed Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
before-CR This issue needs to be resolved before the Candidate Recommendation phase. pr exists
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@msporny @dlongley @OR13