From 2d24d4afb5aecbb167549ec0c7efe42d1517fb89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manu Sporny Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:47:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix grammar in at risk marker for multibit status. Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr --- CONTRIBUTING.md | 4 ++-- index.html | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index a71f7ca..e509bbd 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ in the relevant W3C Working Group or make a non-member patent licensing commitment. If you are not the sole contributor to a contribution (pull request), please -identify all contributors in the pull request comment. +identify all contributors in the pull request comment. -To add a contributor (other than yourself, that's automatic), mark them one per +To add a contributor (other than yourself; that's automatic), mark them one per line as follows: ``` diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 814a43f..abd7d3d 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -442,13 +442,13 @@

BitstringStatusListCredential

-The Working Group is currently seeking implementer feedback with respect to the -usefulness of bitstring entries that have sizes greater than one. The -approach adds complexity to the solution and its not clear if there is -enough of an implementation community to support the feature. The WG is -considering three options 1) keep the feature, 2) allow the feature to be -optionally supported, and 3) remove the feature. At present, the specification -implements the second option. +The Working Group is currently seeking implementer feedback regarding the +utility of bitstring entries that have sizes greater than one. Supporting +such entries adds complexity to the solution, and it's not clear whether there +is enough of an implementation community to support the feature. The WG is +considering three options: (1) require conforming implementations to support +the feature; (2) allow implementations to optionally support the feature; or +(3) remove the feature. At present, the specification implements option (2).