-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐞Ladybird: A new, independent browser engine — written from scratch #56
Comments
Thank you for proposing a session! You may update the session description as needed and at any time before the meeting, but please keep in mind that tooling relies on issue formatting: follow the instructions and leave all headings and other formatting intact in particular. Bots and W3C meeting organizers may also update the description, to fix formatting issues or add links and other relevant information. Please do not revert these changes. Feel free to use comments to raise questions. Do not expect formal approval; W3C meeting organizers endeavor to schedule all proposed sessions that are in scope for a breakout. Actual scheduling should take place shortly before the meeting. |
I notice this is scheduled for the Redondo room — which is not one of the larger rooms but instead can seat maybe 25 people or so? Maybe I’m being overly hopeful, but I suspect there’s a good chance this session might end up attracting significantly more than 25 in-person attendees. I may be wrong, but it’d be a shame for interested people not to be able to sit in on the session just because the room doesn’t have enough capacity. So if in this same time slot but in a larger room there’s another session scheduled that the planners assess might not actually need that larger room during that slot — but could likely manage with doing their session in the Redondo room —then maybe we could swap rooms? (But if it’s too much of a logistical hassle to deal with at this point, then please don’t knock yourselves out trying — I can appreciate how much of challenge it’s already been to try to get things balanced/sized out in the right way for ~90 different sessions spread out over 15 rooms on 3 different floors…) |
@sideshowbarker, we'll move this to California B |
Session description
An intro+Q&A for the Ladybird browser engine: a completely new engine written from scratch (using no code from Blink/Chromium, WebKit/Safari, Gecko/Firefox, or any other browser), and backed by the non-profit Ladybird Browser Initiative — with a policy to never take funding from default search deals or any other forms of user monetization, ever.
Session goal
The session goal it to give a detailed intro to Ladybird, and answer attendees’ questions about it.
Additional session chairs (Optional)
@ADKaster, @gmta, @tcl3
Who can attend
Anyone may attend (Default)
IRC channel (Optional)
#ladybird
Other sessions where we should avoid scheduling conflicts (Optional)
No response
Instructions for meeting planners (Optional)
Preferred time: 10:00am (because we’ll have some Europe-based Ladybird project members joining remotely).
Andrew Kaster, Jelle Raaijmakers, and Tim Ledbetter from the Ladybird Browser Initiative will be attending remotely.
Agenda for the meeting.
Some of the details planned to be covered include:
“AD-HOC:”
comment convention to mark code that doesn’t map to any spec requirements.Navigable.h
,Transferable.h
.53
564
27
216
136
1262
417
3496
1297
13176
Current code size:
cloc --vcs=git
details/comparison (as of 2024-09-01):1695
313947
17189
4586173
14187
5396911
63826
14902914
1010
268796
Testing.
Links to calendar
Meeting materials
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: