-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AI Model Management #15
Comments
Thank you for proposing a session! You may update the session description as needed and at any time before the meeting, but please keep in mind that tooling relies on issue formatting: follow the instructions and leave all headings and other formatting intact in particular. Bots and W3C meeting organizers may also update the description, to fix formatting issues or add links and other relevant information. Please do not revert these changes. Feel free to use comments to raise questions. Do not expect formal approval; W3C meeting organizers endeavor to schedule all proposed sessions that are in scope for a breakout. Actual scheduling should take place shortly before the meeting. |
Slides posted here: https://github.com/webmachinelearning/hybrid-ai/blob/main/presentations/WebML%20Discussion%20-%20Hybrid%20AI%20for%20the%20Web%20-%20AI%20Model%20Management%20TPAC%202024%20Breakout.pdf (summary slides presented in WebML meeting on Sept 23 are in same repo). |
Thanks everyone who attended! Note that draft minutes are now linked from the description. The slides have also been posted in the following repo, which I suggest we use for followup discussion (e.g. via issues): https://github.com/webmachinelearning/hybrid-ai/ Although the name of the repo is "hybrid-ai" most of the material there (so far) has been focused on local model management. |
Session description
AI models can be executed on the client web platform and can add significant functionality to web applications. However, they can also be quite large, requiring significant resources to download and store. Download and compilation latencies can potentially impact the user experience.
This breakout will discuss ways in which these issues can be mitigated. Possible topics include the following.
Note: this is both an AI topic and a Storage topic. Input from both communities would be useful and is encouraged!
There were some related presentations on this topic in the WebML IG.
See:
Session goal
Prioritize issues, discuss highest priority issues, define follow-up actions if possible.
Additional session chairs (Optional)
No response
Who can attend
Anyone may attend (Default)
IRC channel (Optional)
#ai-model
Other sessions where we should avoid scheduling conflicts (Optional)
#23, #36, #39
Instructions for meeting planners (Optional)
Need to avoid scheduling conflicts with sessions related to WoT, Smart Cities, or WNIG.
Agenda for the meeting.
Links to calendar
Meeting materials
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: