-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can we align response data names with Basic Card response data? #15
Comments
As per SRC API specification [1] the payload containing payment credentials such as listed in the question above is encrypted for the recipient. Therefore, I doubt SRC payment method specification should explicitly define the payload members as Basic Card does. To me, SRC Card Response dictionary should contain a subset of data received as a response form Checkout API. It is necessary to define the exact shape of the set of data, but among them, there should be |
For the sake of clarity below is the content of encrypted payload containing payment credentials:
The
The
Note, that both W3C Payment Request and SRC System can provide a shipping address and consumer details (name, e-mail and phone number) to the DPA/Merchant. To me, this overlap of functionality should be tabled as a subject for further discussion. |
@tblachowicz what would you think of this in the payment method response data:
Ian |
Related to my note on shipping addresses and consumer details: w3c/payment-handler#337 |
Here are the Basic Card response [1] fields (first) and the current corresponding SRC response names (second):
It would be great to align at least the first four. Also, do we need billingAddress for SRC?
[1] https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-basic-card/#basiccardresponse-dictionary
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: