Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Email: Oracle feedback on WCAG 3.0 FPWD (1 - General - broader scope than web) #462

Open
jspellman opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
section: abstract & Intro status: comment - no change comment or suggestion - no action required

Comments

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

Comment from Email:

Oracle appreciates the opportunity to give feedback on the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's first public working draft of the W3C Accessibility Guidelines 3.0. By creating WCAG 3.0 from the beginning with the intent that it applies to more than just web sites it in turn enables us to have more clarity on how the guidelines apply to our non-web products. We appreciate the work that has gone into writing the guidelines in a clear manner and adding the outcomes that better describe the intent and goal of the guidelines. This has resulted in the guidelines being more understandable which in turn leads to teams being better able to achieve them. There are a few areas of concern that we would like to see improved.

@jspellman jspellman added section: abstract & Intro status: comment - no change comment or suggestion - no action required labels Mar 12, 2021
@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
section: abstract & Intro status: comment - no change comment or suggestion - no action required
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant