Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Email: ITI Comments on First Public Working Draft of W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 (13 - Process definition) #455

Open
jspellman opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

Comment from Email:
from PDF

  1. Is this approach of using complete processes as the smallest unit of conformance workable for different types of organizations? These include organizations with very large, dynamic, or complex content, medium-sized organizations relying on external accessibility resources, and very small organizations with limited resources?

It was not immediately clear that the smallest unit of conformance is a process, so the group should review the document to make this more clear, including adding this to the “Differences from WCAG 2.x” section.
The use of process as the unit of conformance, which could include a single page in some cases, seems like a useful concept. The challenge with this is in the definition of process, which is rather loosely defined as “A process is a complete activity the user performs.”. There may be a challenge when content providers - disagree with others on what constitutes a process. Having examples of what is not a process would help greatly.

@jspellman jspellman added section: testing status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) labels Mar 12, 2021
@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your comment. Project members are working on your comment. You may see discussion in the comment thread and we may ask for additional information as we work on it. We will mark the official response when we are finished and close the issue.

@slauriat
Copy link
Contributor

Drafted response:

It was not immediately clear that the smallest unit of conformance is a process, so the group should review the document to make this more clear, including adding this to the “Differences from WCAG 2.x” section.

Agreed that we should make concepts and direction around things like processes clearer, including in the introduction and "Differences from WCAG 2.x" sections.

The use of process as the unit of conformance, which could include a single page in some cases, seems like a useful concept. The challenge with this is in the definition of process, which is rather loosely defined as “A process is a complete activity the user performs.”. There may be a challenge when content providers - disagree with others on what constitutes a process. Having examples of what is not a process would help greatly.

Also agreed! We'll follow up as we get "processes" figured out a bit more in-depth and with some illustrative examples, so that we can check on it looks and fits together, more practically speaking.

@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley removed status: assigned to subgroup ask subgroup for proposal section: testing Subgroup: editors no specific subgroup (default) labels Jan 20, 2022
@rachaelbradley rachaelbradley added this to the Foundation: Scoping milestone Jan 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants