Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0 2022-06-15

[awoie]

We have conducted a self-review of our spec Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0, and the results can be found at w3c/vc-data-model#1157.

Please check our findings.

[simoneonofri]

Hello, on this topic @verocri @andrea-dintino and @jaromil are working for the Post-Quantum-Cryptography.

Ref. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/simoneonofri_post-quantum-identity-standards-activity-7198217313240670208-5WnT

[andrea-dintino]

Hello, on this topic @verocri @andrea-dintino and @jaromil are working for the Post-Quantum-Cryptography.

Ref. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/simoneonofri_post-quantum-identity-standards-activity-7198217313240670208-5WnT

We're making a WG just for that (w3c-ccg/community#247), we just announced that we support ML-DSA-44 and DigitalBazaar mentioned they'd support us

[simoneonofri]

@andrea-dintino it is indeed good to notice a problem and develop a solution :D

[innotommy]

Thanks, @awoie, for the self-review. The SING has recently reached the final approval, and with the help of @simoneonofri, we are starting to tackle all the security reviews.

[innotommy]

As a result of a security review from SING, we did not identify any blocking concerns. However, as anticipated today during the meeting, we will raise non-blocking issues to help improve the security consideration section.

[awoie]

As a result of a security review from SING, we did not identify any blocking concerns. However, as anticipated today during the meeting, we will raise non-blocking issues to help improve the security consideration section.

Thanks a lot for doing this!

@msporny SING did not identify any blocking concerns but they will raise non-blocking issues to help improve the security consideration section.